Friday, April 29, 2005

Waiting for the Rapture

Am I the only person who is waiting... hoping... praying... for the Rapture to come, so that all of the "really good Christians" get carried away and I get left behind and then I dont every have to listen to their pompous, self-agrandizing, arrogant, insufferable bullshit again!

I can't be the only one, right?

Do you know what my worst nightmare is? My worst nightmare is that, by some fluke of humanity, one of these idiots actually translate Revelations correctly, and it all happens the way they say it will, and I don't get left behind. I have to go with them and spend all of eternity listening to their puffed-up, adle-pated moronic pap. Then I would know God truly, truly hated me.

If this were to happen, and there's a way to commit suicide in Heaven, I'd find it.

I don't know... Between Focus on the Family and the 700 Club, Jesus must be rolling in his grave right about now. (Just kidding, J-man... ya know I love ya....) Seriously, this can't have been what he had in mind.

I've been thinking a lot about this lately (as those of you who have been around me since the November elections know, since I rant about it, ad nauseum). I could be wrong, but I think Christianity may be inately, inherently... I don't know.... broken. I don't mean to say that all Christians are bad or wrong or crazy. There are many brilliant, loving, truly compassionate, Christ-following Christians. And, Christ knows, among every group (and among the non-affiliated as well), you're going to find your unadulterated nutbags. But I think the nature of Christianity as a collective religion -- from its foundation in pagan Roman worship to its history of crusades and inquisitions -- may be flawed in such a way that it derails too easily into something oppressive and ugly.

After the elections (which took place on my 46th birthday), I realized that I didn't want to align myself with Christianity anymore. I felt that, if I couldn't stop the onslaught, I could at least do my part to weaken the slathering masses by one -- me. While I am still a believer in Christ, I no longer call myself a "Christian." I had considered the path of Messianic Judaism, but after a couple of encounters with that group, I was surprised to see that the average Messianic Jew is trying to "out-Baptist" the Baptists. No, thanks. I was left on my own to figure out where I stand -- which, when you get right down to it, is where one should be when determining the nature of one's faith. And being so "unassigned" left me free to figure out what I believe.

Here's what I've come to. If Jesus didn't talk about it, God doesn't think it's that important. Jesus wasn't an accidental guy. He was very intentional and deliberate. You'd have to be to spend the last few years of your life getting the crap kicked out of you, knowing that at the end of it all, you were going to day a miserably painful death for the sins of others. Homosexuality? Jesus never mentioned it. Ergo, God doesn't think it's important. Abortion (and, yes, there was abortion back then)? Jesus never so much as hinted at it. Tom DeLay, Bill Frist, Antonin Scalia, and the new Pope may be obsessed about abortion, but the Lord wasn't, or Jesus would have brought it up a time or two.

What did Jesus talk about, with unswerving, unambiguous clarity? Love. Tolerance. Social reform. Peace. Acceptance. Lack of judgementalism. Caring for those who can't care for themselves (Matthew 25:31 - 46). These are the things we must do that we are refusing to do. And I find it more than a little disconcerting. Because another thing Jesus did talk about was that, someday, he would be back. He didn't talk about "the Rapture" per se. But he is returning someday, and I personally would kind of like to have the metaphorical living room straightened up when he gets here.

So, I'll keep working on it in my own little way, finding my own path. I bought a pendant that reflects where I'm going spiritually of late.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
I wear it to remind me that Jesus wasn't a Christian -- he was born and died a Jew. And because we already know that he was nothing if not intentional, there had to be a reason for that. So, everybody just go on about your business, as if nothing was out of the ordinary. I'll just be over here, Hoovering the lounge, and Pledging the coffeetable.... just in case.
Then, at the very least, if I get "left behind," the living room will be nice and tidy.
XOXO
~C~

Wearing Our Causes On (or Under) Our Sleeves

I swore I'd never do it. I swore I'd resist. Then I got one. Just one. Because a friend was running in a triathlon, and I figured the least I could do was support her. So I got one. Then, I got the second one, because, well, it was for a cause that was near and dear to my heart. Then, the third one was even nearer and dearer….

I'm talking, of course, about these:



Image hosted by Photobucket.com



The purple one -- for the Lymphoma and Leukemia Society's TEAM triathlon -- was bought to support co-worker friend of mine participated in the event (you go, girl!). The red one was purchased about two weeks later, from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, because my mother had the disease. The black one -- my favorite -- was given to me as gift and says it all, really: "I Did Not Vote 4 Bush." I wear this one like a medic-alert bracelet. In case I ever drop dead on a sidewalk or get run over by a bus, I'd like this to be the last, most prominent thing that anyone remembers about me.

You know who we have to thank for this, don't you. Lance Armstrong. His yellow "LIVESTRONG" bracelets weren't the first rubber bracelets to take off. Believe it or not, there's actually a The trend originated back in the '70s, with punk rockers who wore black o-rings (presumably to set off the safety pins in their lips), and was perfected in its current state by Nike, with the "baller" and "player" bracelets. But it was the LIVESTRONG bracelets that ignited the launched the rubber bracelet in the charity arena. Pink ones for breast cancer, orange for tsunami relief, even (and I'm not making this up) desert camo to support our troops in Iraq.

How did this happen? How did I get suckered into this? And, more importantly, is it really prudent to wearing red and purple together, because, like, they totally clash? (Fashion and compassion are not mutually exclusive, after all.) I have a theory as to why I've gone from none, to one, to three in .06 seconds. I think it's because I missed out on the whole POW bracelet thingie back in the '70s. My friend, Tracey Taylor, had two. One of her guys came home, and I think the other was eventually listed as KIA. But she wore those names on her arm for several months in 1974 before we watched the planes land and prisoners come home.

So, maybe it's over compensation for the whole POW/MIA bracelet lack. Or maybe I just like wearing rubber on my wrist. Whatever the reason, I wear my causes on my sleeve these days, and somehow it gives me comfort.

XOXO

~C~

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

Nat'l Administrative Professionals' Day, Part Deux

I see by the big clock on my side (see right sidebar) that it's 10 past five in the afternoon.

I just cranked out my first actual piece of work today.

I was home sick yesterday.

I feel like being home sick tomorrow.

Can you say, "Disillusioned, disenfranchised, disengaged, discombobulated, and disasterous?"

Yeah... me, neither....

~C~

Touching Paper

Today is (according to Hallmark, anyway) National Secretaries' Day. Or, if you are a man and can't bear to be thought of as doing "woman's work," National Administrative Professionals Day. In recognition of that, and the fact that Monday was my official ten-year anniversary with Fox, I'm telling my employment story.... just this once, then never again.... (Thank God! I hear you all collectively breathe.)

I wish I could say my cubicle was "Dilbert-like" -- at least then I might have a little peace and quiet behind those high, solitary walls made famous in the comic strip. But our cubicles at Fox are in the hallway and have very short walls -- four feet at best. Management praises the "open, airy feeling which might allow for some natural light to spill into the cubicles from adjacent offices." A nice theory, I'll grant you. The trouble is that the designers of the space intentionally staggered most of the office doorways that rim the floor of the building so that they don't open directly toward the cubicles. This was presumably to minimize noise into the offices. We in the cubicles have no such noise reduction strategies.

While Management calls the work place arrangement "open-air," we who work in it call it other things, many of which are not repeatable in mixed company. But "hog pens" is the most commonly accepted description of the cubicle arrangement, at least by the folks who actually have to work here. I sit here as I type this now and think, "How did I get here?" And then I think, "How long have I been here?" And then I think, "Who am I and where did it all go so horribly wrong?" And then I sigh and go back to typing.

My job title at present is "Senior Legal Assistant." The description of this job is "to provide administrative and clerical support to in-house legal counsel in the Theatrical Motion Picture Production Legal Department, to create initial drafts of contracts for artists and talent for completion by counsel, to create and distribute copies of draft contracts and documents to all necessary parties and departments, to disburse rights and some talent payments, and to disburse and distributed signed agreements to all necessary parties and departments."

All of that boils down to one thing. I touch paper that's been touched by the stars.

Ridley Scott. Mike Judge. Queen Latifah. Renee Zellweger. Ewan MacGregor. Yep, I've drafted them all. In fact, just last fall, I had the honor of losing Ann Margret's signed agreements. That was a new experience. I still haven't found a classy, plausibly deniable way of breaking it to her reps. I've been ignoring them.

If that sounds mean, bear this mind. They ignore me all the time. I keep a bulletin board next to my desk with copies of passport photos which were submitted by talent along with their employment paperwork. I keep telling the agents that, as long as the paperwork is completed, they don't need to send us the passport copies. They don't listen. Agents rarely listen. I think the constant din in their heads of "cha-ching" drowns out the sound of my voice.

Anyway, back to my mini-Hall of Fame. Kevin Spacey was the first, and still occupies the central place of honor. It's a cute passport photo, although he resembles an accountant more than an actor. Saturday Night Live's Dax Shepard sent a copy of his passport and his driver's license, also both adorable photos. Dakota Fanning's rep sent her passport, but the copy isn't good. I keep it because I think she's just the cutest thing, and she was one of the few actors whose reps didn't give me any lip. Amy Irving sent hers in color. She's a very attractive woman, that Amy Irving. She takes a nice passport photo. A couple of writers and producers also adorn my walls -- no one you've ever heard of, but people I think are nice and didn't give me any trouble.

Sensing a trend here? Want to stay on my good side? Refrain from working my last nerve. That is how I measure success these days -- by the level of trouble and bother to which I must go in order to see a task through to completion. It wasn't always like this. I used to love my job. I used to live for my job. I used to wake up in the morning, anxious to be able to get to work. What happened?

It started innocently enough, as most things in life do, with a divorce. Mine. In 1991, at the same time the country was busy scouring its way out of the depression the first George Bush precipitated, my four-year-old marriage unraveled at the seams. Since my marriage in 1987, I'd mostly been a stay-at-home wife and mother. I had held a couple of jobs outside the house -- a craft business with my mother-in-law and sister-in-law, a pre-school teacher -- but these paid very little and didn't sparkle on a resume. My primary job during those years were running a home and raising a highly intelligent and energetic toddler. For all the hype about valuing housewives and the work they do, it's just that -- hype. After my marriage failed and I returned to the job market, though I'd held fairly decent paying clerical jobs prior to my marriage, I couldn't get past the Human Resources department. Unbeknownst to me, during the process of childbirth, two-thirds of my brain fell out of the back of my head. Now, apparently, I was too stupid to be employable. At least that's what I was made to feel like.

"What have you been doing with your time lately?" an HR coordinator would ask.

"You mean, my free time?" I would query, just for the purposes of clarification. "After running the house, handling the laundry, the bills, the kid, and the very high-maintenance, soon-to-be-ex-husband? After that? Well, nothing else really. After all that, my day's been pretty much shot."

"Yes, but none of those tasks qualifies you for anything here at ," invariably came the reply.

So much for a housewife's work being worth around $160,000 a year. The truth is, a housewife's work is only worth that if you have to get someone besides the housewife to do it.

To make matters worse, years spent away from the keyboard had rendered my typing skills -- heretofore dicey at best -- virtually atrophied. I couldn’t time test above 45 words per minute on typing tests for any of these corporations. That was about 20 words per minute too slow for anything more than a file clerk. And the file clerk position was looking pretty golden, believe me.

It was the early 90's, before Al Gore got around to inventing the Internet, so there were no Monster.coms or Yahoo!Jobs. If you were at all computer savvy, and you were lucky enough to have a modem -- a fairly rare peripheral back in those days -- you could log on to a subscription computer bulletin board (BBS) service to connect with people in your area. I subscribed to a BBS called Modem Butterfly. I was living alone for the first time in four years, all of my recent friends had dropped away since the divorce, and my ex had been quite efficient at separating me from all of my premarital friends. I was lonely, and Modem Butterfly offered me the chance to connect with some living, breathing people without having to find a sitter for the toddler.

It wasn't like the Internet. Nearly all of the members were LA-local. We had parties. We had BBQs. We met in clumps for coffee, and occasionally took in a movie together. It was an eclectic bunch of folks with little in common but a modem and a will to use it. I loved it, and I loved them. In those days, live chat sequences appeared in "real time," meaning that as you typed, the letters appeared across the chat field instantly. If you made a mistake or were a terrible typist, there was no way to hide it. As you hit backspace to correct yourself, your chat buddy watched the cursor move backwards across the field. I love good conversation, and interrupting it with typos made me nuts, so I tried to type as accurately as I could in live chat. I spent many hours losing myself in chat sessions with people who empathized with my circumstances, who offered advice -- some good, some lame -- and who were just there to listen when I needed a friendly ear.

After a month or two, two remarkable things happened. A woman named Stephanie paged me to chat. Though I'd never met her, we had a mutual friend at the BBS. I entered into live chat with her. She told me she was an employment counselor with a temp agency that was anxiously looking for additions to their pool. She'd heard from our mutual friend I might be looking for work. I warned her of my poor typing skills and the fact that I hadn't been employed outside the home for four years. She pointed out that temping might be just the thing to reestablish a work record. I made an appointment for the following Monday. Someone had actually asked me to come and interview with her for a possible job.

That was Remarkable Thing Number One.

Remarkable Thing Number Two happened that Monday during the typing test. I tested at 68 words per minute, with only two errors. I was stunned. I asked Stephanie to recount. She assured me the results were accurate. Apparently, all the time I'd spent in live chat on Modem Butterfly had honed my touch typing skills without my realizing it.

A week later, I stepped into a temp position in the Contract Administrations Department at Paramount Pictures. It was, in many ways, a little dream come true. First, I was working. That was cause for celebration alone. Second, I was working at a movie studio, which was a vast improvement from the few jobs I had managed to scrounge doing filing at insurance companies. Third, and maybe most miraculous, I was working at Paramount, where my father had worked for several years, first as a story editor, then as an executive story consultant on BONANZA. From the window at my temporary desk, I had a clear view of Stage 5, where I'd spent many a happy time hanging by knees from the hitching post that stood in front of the Ponderosa.

I was home. At least temporarily. At least as long as it took for someone to come back from maternity leave. I wondered from time to time precisely how much of her brain she lost afte giving birth. Oddly enough, she returned after four months, brain seemingly intact, and ready for her job back.

No matter -- I had wormed my way into the hearts of the Feature Legal Department. Besides computer BBSs and Bush-instigated recessions, the other thing that was big news in '92 was AIDS. And one of the Legal Files clerks, Jason, had it. He'd had it for a while, but this was pre-protease cocktails. Full-blown AIDS was nearly always a foregone conclusion. I moved from temping in Contract Administration to temping in Legal Files, where I stayed as temp for six long months. Meanwhile, Jason began his descent into the last stages of the disease. He evolved from the vital, funny, fiery Latino man I'd grown fond of from my first temp assignment, to a withered, confused, pale cadaverous shell of his former self. The last time I saw him, I didn't recognize him, which was only fair, since he didn't recognize me, either. In fact, he had no recollection of ever meeting me. I didn't feel too bad, though. My officemate, Michael, had worked with him for nearly eight years, and Jason couldn't remember his name when he came to visit that day. Later, we would learn that the Kaposi's Sarcoma that marred his handsome face was working behind the scenes, too, and had established several lesions on his brain. Wit, spirit and good looks, no matter how abundant, are no match for cancerous brain lesions.

Jason finally died in his sleep one night, and the department supervisor, Ronnie, called me into her office the next morning. She offered me Jason's position permanently, complete with a raise and full benefits. I cried. I was emotional about finally being gainfully employed, certainly. But I could not shake the knowledge that someone had to die for me to get here. I felt horrible and more than a little mercenary. In a way, I felt as though I were just another opportunistic infection which was taking advantage of Jason's low T-cell count. Then, Ronnie told me something I had never known before.

"Jason was the one who recommended that you be the one to replace him before he left," she said.

At that moment, everything changed. I hadn't stolen this job like a thief in the night -- it was a gift. Jason had given me the last thing he could before he left -- a new start. It is probably the greatest gift I've ever received, both for its timeliness and for the dividends its accrued in the years since, and it was given by a man who was little more than a friendly acquaintance.

Within three years, I had moved from file clerk to legal assistant, and later moved with my Paramount boss to a position at Fox, where I've been since 1995. Since my arrival here, I've doubled my salary and am actually at the top of my pay scale. Even more amazing to me, I've achieved a kind of "street cred" as the assistant who "knows everything." "Ask Amanda," it is frequently said. "She'll know." And, amazingly, I usually do. I attribute this more to longevity than to any overt expertise on my part. After being the "new girl" for so long, I looked up one day to realize I was the second most senior assistant on the floor.

Which brings us back around to the hog pens. Perhaps I'm just too comfortable in my position here. Maybe I've just done it so long, it's lost its joy. It started around September 11th, I think, when, along with 80% of America, I started to ask, "Is that all there is?" I don't suffer fools gladly, which is a handicap in a place where suffering fools is practically in the job description (I refer you back to the part where it says I have to "create initial drafts of contracts for artists and talent for completion by counsel." When I hear an actress is whining that she wants a bigger house for her stay while shooting in Austin, Texas, because the 2000-square-foot rental provided to her is not spacious enough to house her and her three-year-old child, plus the hundred-and-six-pound Belgian nanny, I feel an overwhelming desire to call her up personally and ask her to imagine what being inside Tower One as it was collapsing might have felt like. Or what it might feel like to have cancerous lesions slowly consuming your brain as your bodily systems begin to shut down, one by one.

A pointless exercise, to be sure. I do realize this. This is Hollywood, baby. Not the city, exactly, but the state of mind. It's all a game here. Make the most money. Cut the best deal. Get the biggest house. Go on to the next movie, where you can say, "But on the film I just made for Fox I got such-and-such."

One of my coworkers has a button stuck on the outside of her hog pen/cubicle, which is erroneously attributed to Alfred Hitchcock. The story goes that Hitchcock was directing Ingrid Bergman in Notorious. Bergman, who was accustomed to working with intense European and American directors, found the reserved Englishman unreceptive to her passionate inquiries as to her character's backstory and motivations. Though, in reality, Hitchcock never uttered the words, the sentiment sums up the way I've tried to think of this job in the past few years.
The button says, "It's only a movie, Ingrid."

XOXO
~C~

Sunday, April 24, 2005

Next Blog

I admit it. I'm obsessed. I've become a victim... of the "Next Blog" button at the top of Blogger.com sites. It's a little like gambling, only without the horrifying, financially devastating consequences. Most blogs provide for the option of the "next blog" button. For a while, I resisted the urge to put it on my site, let alone click it myself. But I'm an addictive, compulsive personality, and I find that needlessly resisting temptation is wearing on my psyche.

So, I click. And click. And click again.

What do I find? Lots of interesting things. And some not-so-interesting things. I find that many people blog the way I used to journal. They start with a couple of fine entries and then do something foolish, like get married and have babies, and the blogs end up alone and abandoned, left to fend for themselves, like little children on the streets of New Delhi. I find that some soulless bastards have decided to use free blog sites as an opportunity to sell me things I already have or never wanted. I find this incredibly wasteful and annoying, but much less disturbing than pop-ups, so I can live with it, I suppose.

I find that many people who don't speak English blog, and I find myself wishing that we had the nifty Star Trek translator device that just allowed everyone to experience language the way they could understand it. I'm not sure, but I suspect that people in France and Brazil are having a kickin' good time without me, and for some reason, that bothers me. I want to come to the party, too.

I've stumbled on some good blogs through "next blog" -- Cooking with Amy was a "next blog" find, in fact. A lot of people, like the Crumleys and The Wendy Lady, are in the blog-biz for the purposes of keeping in touch with family and friends who are far away. It's brilliant for that. I'm trying to talk some family who are poor correspondents into starting blogs, so they don't have to write long e-mails. And I come from a family of artists, so their writing would make good entertainment, whether you knew them or not.

It's a chain -- I find a website through "next blog" that lists another blog that I find I must read, and that blog lists a third. I'm still new to the blogging community. I'm discovering that bloggers are really loyal to each other. They read each others stuff. They comment on each other lives. They encourage each other, celebrate in each other's joys, condole in each other's losses, find comfort in connecting with someone who's going through the same ups and downs. Tash of Elephants & Dragonflies has just discovered she's pregnant, and with the click of a button, several dozen of her closest friends, people she's never met, nor likely ever will, all share in the joy of her positive pregnancy test. On the other side of the fence, Julie documented her battles with infertility, and her subsequent pregnancy on A Little Bit Pregnant, all with a kind of honesty, humor and aplomb that I doubt I could muster under such trying conditions. Now the mother of a baby boy, her entries have drifted into social observations that transcend the ordinary. Meanwhile, Kate of Corporate Peon, who expresses no desire to be pregnant or have children, gives a detailed description of a dream she had of giving birth, and wonders what it might mean (I suggested she was either feeling vulnerable and needed taking care of, or she'd eaten Thai food too close to bedtime -- dream analysis is not an exact science, after all).

Blogging is both best and worst of what the world wide web has to offer. Like journaling, it's a chance to be brutally honest, funny without being p.c., opinionated without being judged. Even unwelcome comments are easier to take in this arena -- the ability to hit the "delete" button on any needlessly mean attacks on your spirit is healing in a way that therapy never could be. How different would our lives be today if we could have simply deleted all the attempts to kill our little souls by clicking a button?

Unlike journaling, instead of closing the page and hiding such thoughts away until the next time you need to release them, we perversely click "publish" and send them out into the world for everyone to see. Blogging is shameless. It's brazen. It's unthinkably exposed and indecent. And we all share in it with each other, egging each other on, pushing each other to new heights of exposure. Anonymity helps. But so does having a medium where people can't interrupt you when you're talking.

So, I click "next blog," looking for a new contact, a new connection, a new friend. Someone whose thoughts and ideas and language speak to me. Humor, angst, neurosis -- something I can hang my hat on. It's a gamble, sure. But sometimes, it pays off.

Blog well, my darlings.

XOXO
~C~

Saturday, April 23, 2005

Shameless Self-Promotion

As the headline says... "Art. Fiction. Unfettered Opinion." I'm sure I don't need to direct your attention to the unfettered opinion. You'll find the art in the sidebar to your right. As for the fiction, well, I'm finally getting that together as well.

I have started a couple of other blogs in addition to this one. They will serve as venues for some of the more creative stuff I'm doing these days. The first, Please, Not While I'm Eating, is where my collection of essays and musings about food and my childhood is taking shape. I've only gotten through the first part of Chapter 1, but I'm liking where it's heading in my head so far.

The second, Catharine's Fiction, is where I've started to put my short stories as they come about. I've begun a new short story there, entitled Vision, and I have absolutely no idea where it's going at this point -- just that I have two strong characters ( a homeless semi-amnesiac and the Virgin Mary), an environment, and an event. What becomes of it all, we'll just have to discover together.

One thing I should point out, for the sake of clarity. I carry the "Creative Commons" copyright symbol on this website -- you'll find that in the sidebar as well. Clicking the icon will explain beautiful what I will and won't allow with regard to the posts directly to the Chron. I think it's all pretty fair, and I'm open to allowing unrestricted use, provided my permission is obtained beforehand.

The two other blogs are another matter entirely. All rights are unconditionally reserved to both of them. Their content is completely copyrighted and no reproduction or duplication of anything that appears on those blogs is allowed without my direct, written consent. But, hey, all this is written on those blogs. Why be a downer, huh? Why kill the joy, harsh the mellow, and poop on the party.

Let's watch Catharine be creative, as if she were in a fishbowl or a circus or something. It's reality. Isn't that what we're looking for these days? Isn't this exciting? Aren't you on the edge of your seat? Well, hold on tight, darlings.... It could get a little turbulent before it's all done.

XOXO

~C~

Friday, April 22, 2005

Google sez...

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

It's Earth Day 2005.

Now that's a celebration I can get behind.

I don't know if I ever mentioned it, but I'm originally from Earth.

No... really....

~C~

We Baaaaaaack!

As a couple of you know who tuned in yesterday, someone came along (pretending to be me) and, uhhh... hit the wrong button at the wrong time. She looked a lot like me.... same height... about same weight (except I'm thinner and carry it better)... same color eyes and hair.... And then, pretending to be me, she managed to hit the wrong button.... And delete the Chron.

Poof!

Fortunately, I go through an FTP server independent of Blogger, so the information was preserved. I recreated the Chron, and my trusty server superhero, JD, resident god of JD-DCH and Cybernetic Bumper Breath, restored all the connections and got us back up and running. After giving me a sound pummeling with a smelly trout, of course
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

-- which was thoroughly unfair, I thought, since it was not I who caused it all, but rather that other woman who looked like me (only I'm prettier and have better posture). Anyway, JD went above and beyond, we love him, we forgive him for the "trouting" -- and the cyberwedgie (another story for a later time) -- and we are his best friend forever for saving the Chron.

Most of the posts have been replaced, though I've got an HTML error somewhere on the page that I'll have to suss out, since I keep getting loading messages in IE that read "Done, but errors on the page." Then again, that might be just the way it should be. In Persia (now Iran), the most gifted rug weavers would intentionally weave their rugs with a tiny flaw or two, in order to prove that only Allah is perfect, and anything earthly attempting perfection is disrespectful to the flawlessness of Allah.

We have no wish to be disrespectful in the sight of God, and so we remain....


Imperfectly yours,
~C~

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

My Kind of English

Speaking of CrumleyDotOrg (see post below), I got this one off of her blog. Interesting... I'm a native Californian, with two parents raised in the south, one who spent a few years living in Germany, the other who lived for two years in England, both of whom lived in New York for a few years, and who raised me here in Southern California -- mostly the San Fernando Valley, no less ("Oh, mah Gaawwwd! No weeeh!"), but spent summers in Texas and has spent considerable time either hanging around in England, talking in an English accent, or simply watching BBC America.

According to the brief quiz on this site, here is my linguistic profile:

Your Linguistic Profile:
  • 45% General American English
  • 30% Yankee
  • 15% Upper Midwestern
  • 10% Dixie
  • 0% Midwestern

Check it out yourself. I'd love to know what kind of English my target audience speaks. Oh... I spent a year in college in Kansas. Apparently, it had no lasting affect.

XOXO

~C~

Damn Fine Blogs

[See earlier post on my bad blogging experiences first, please. Thx.]

Okay, I said we'd get to the good stuff, as I see it, and here it is. I'm sure that as time passes and venture more into the blogging world, other sites will jump out at me and make me beam with joy and inner peace. But for now, let me just introduce you to a couple that I am really liking so far. Bear in mind, they're in no particular order, after the first one (because she introduced me to blogs in the first place, so she goes first).

CrumleyDotOrg -- Not a Blogger blog, but a fine example of the mundane made heartwarming and amusing. The first blog I ever encountered belonged to a woman who, at the time, called herself SillyRed, and was documenting her struggle to conceive her first child. She had a few bumps and troubles along the way -- getting pregnant, sustaining a pregnancy, handling other people's pregnancies -- all of which she was unbelievably, outrageously, amazingly honest about in her now-defunkt blog. She came clean about her frustrations, her anger, her sadness and her disappointment, and (added bonus here) she's a gifted writer with a wonderful sense of humor. Happily, the need for that old blog vanished, as SillyRed (aka Mrs. Crumley) gave birth to a bouncing (and we do mean bouncing) baby boy last year. CrumleyDotOrg is their family blog, full of pictures of the Crumleys and their little boy as he grows, and Mrs. Crumley's observations of life, love, Mr. Crumley, and the little Crumley. A wholesome little family blog, full of amusing anecdotes and photos. Though I've never actually met the Crumleys, I adore them -- and I think you will, too. One of the best personal blogs around.

Actual Unretouched Photo -- Whereby our stalwart heroine, Mel, bravely and (nearly) single-handedly battles four children, time-zone ignorant relatives, and the city council to make the world safe for Democracy. And she's funny. And she's a pretty derned good writer, too.

Random Aimee -- We like Aimee because she reads her horoscope, swears like a sailor and has a wicked sense of humor. We also like Aimee because she asks the salient questions, the questions that must be asked, the questions that require asking and answering in order to preserve our humanity. Questions like, "In a company of nearly 4000 people, how fucking hard can it be to find a fine-point pen?" Attagirl, Aimee. You go! We're all here, right behind you... waiting to borrow your fine-point pen.

WaiterRant -- The blog that answers the musical question, "Do you want pomme frites with that?" If you want to know what life is like on the other side of the menu, Waiter waits to clue you in. He's funny, he's smart, he's honest, and he seems to like his job (most of the time, anyway). I suspect he's probably really good at his job, too, and since I am well aware that, though endowed with many skills and talents, waiting tables would be a job at which I would thoroughly suck, I admire that ability in a person.

A Cat's Eye -- Sandy, a sassy calico, regales us with stories of her day when her human adoptive parents, Food Miss Mommy and Dearest Daddy Meatler, have left the house for the day to go to work, or to Petsmart, or wherever they'll be gone for a while. Ordinarily, I find "pet blogs" a little dull and cutesy. But there's something about this blog. The voice... the tone... the things that are said... I have suspicions.... I suspect that Sandy's adoptive parents have no clue about this blog. I suspect that Sandy waits for the minivan to pull out, clicks on the computer and types her posts herself, swearing the dog and the other small, rodent-like pets to secrecy under penalty of death -- though she herself has admitted to being de-clawed, so it boggles the mind what evil awaits a snitch in Sandy's universe.

That's all the blog raving I have time for today. I intentionally omitted friends' blogs (though I mentioned A Twist of Kate as a good blog in the earlier post on rants), because what I find interesting about friends' blogs is the ability to keep up with friends' lives on a daily basis, despite school, work and life in general.

I have to go back to work now. Betty Thomas is a-hankerin' for a director's agreement, and I'm wearing just the pair dancin' slippers to fax it to her. Check out the blogs, make one of your own, write well, be good and drink your milk.

XOXO
~C~

RantShareTantrumVent

It isn't like this website thing is really new to me. I've been doing it in earnest since April of 2002. But the whole blog world -- or should I say, "underworld" -- that's a new experience for me.

I figure, since I'm benefitting from "NavBar" hits on my own site, I owe it to my fellow BloggerDotCommers to check out their sites as well. So, I hit "next blog" and I'm off. And what do I find? Well, there are some damn fine blogs out there, and we'll get to those in a moment. What I find a lot of, though, are blog entries that run on and on about the lady at the dry cleaner who cut you off in line, then took 10 minutes looking for her favorite pen so she could sign the VISA slip, and then stepped back and accidentally (NOT) dug the three inch heel of her $600 Manolo Blahnicks into your sandaled big toe (it being the first warm day of spring and all, and you just having had a pedicure on Sunday because you knew the weather was going to turn, and now you can't wear your cute summer sandals because your big toe is all black and blue.

Let me explain something, people. And I'll be as gentle as I can. Back in the olden days... before blogs... before personal webpages... before journals, even.... back in those days, they had these things called "diaries." The diaries frequently came with a lock, to keep prying eyes away from a) honest rantings that could hurt other's feelings unnecessarily, and b) written testimonies that could result in your prosecution on any number of Class D felonies. But the point was this -- that's where the rantings and ravings over dry cleaner ladies in Manolo Blahnicks belong, not in the broad light of day, where people can see them.

I'm not talking about keeping tabs on one's mundane life. Frequently, some of my favorite blogs concern the daily activities of a family or a person who just has a normal life going on, though sometimes in an unusual way (witness, for example, The Wendy Lady's The Poland Diaries and my friend Kathy's A Twist of Kate). I'm talking about rants. Vents. Tantrums. Any blog entry that begins with the words, "I just had to vent...," or has as its subject line any form of the word "rant" must be deleted for all time.

That doesn't mean you can't express what you think. It just means that you can't vent or rant. Discourse should be conducted in a reasonably civilized fashion. Not only because intelligent verbal exchange is what separates us from the great apes, but because it is simply better writing. Normal people doing ordinary things but relating them in amusing ways is at the heart of extremely popular newspaper and magazine columns written by the likes of Jack Anderson, Dave Barry and Erma Bombeck.

But bad writing is indefensible under any circumstances, and unless you're Andy Rooney or Jerry Seinfeld, the odds are good that your rants and vents are going to be boring little tirades that no one cares about but you. If you're ranting, it better be damn funny, or I'm never visiting your petty little blog again, and neither are the majority of people who happen to click "next blog" and have it inflicted with your tantrum.

Keep it funny. Keep it fun. Keep it updated. Check your spelling. Check your homonyms (note to self). And that, my dear littles, is the end of my rant.

XOXO
~C~

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

One of the Seven Signs of the Apocalypse

Today, Restaurant magazine named The Fat Duck, a small restaurant in Bray, Berkshire, England tops on the list of the world's 50 best restaurants. That's right, boys and girls. Five hundred chefs and food experts were polled and named a British restaurant the best place to eat in the whole wide world.

Let me looks... [rushes to check her Thompson's New International version of the Bible] ... rivers of fire... moon turns to blood.... yep... here it is... English food made hallowed....
Somebody's gonna get "left behind."

~C~

Monday, April 18, 2005

What the *Bleep* Do We Know?

I rented this movie from Netflix and watched it with Savannah this weekend. Big mistake -- because now I'm going to have to invest more time watching it again and again. The movie, in case you don't know, is a little genre-mongrel of a film consisting of documentary, theoretical narrative and drama, all depicting our mixed up, messed up, ambivalent relationship with reality and what it is and isn't.

The filmmakers interviewed (on-camera) fourteen experts -- physicists, psychologist, medical doctors, and spiritual guides -- about what constitutes reality from spiritual, physical and theoretical standpoints. The results were fascinating. One of the first interviews is with Canadian physicist Dr. William Tiller, who rightly points out that, if you take history into account, including everything we used to believe was true that turned out later not to be true, then the odds are good that very little of what we believe now is actually true. He uses our knowledge of the atom, past and present, to illustrate this point later in the film. The atom, it was once believed, was a tiny bit of particulate matter (the nucleus), surrounded by a larger, amorphous swarm of inconstant electrons, disappearing and reappearing seemingly at random (he and other scientists make the point that there probably is a pattern, whether we comprehend it or not). Now, physicists believe that, rather than being solid, the nucleus itself consists of even smaller bits of particulate matter that also disappear and reappear. We know this because we've cracked the damn thing open.

So, since we know now that everything we used to believe about the atom -- the building block of the universe -- was entirely wrong, and what we know now could still be wrong (and probably is), then doesn't it stand to reason that everything we know about the universe could be wrong? Of course it does. What if no particulate matter is actually solid, but merely infintely smaller bits that flash and flicker and are brushed aside and come back together depending on forces that act up on them. And what if the acting forces aren't just actions, but also thoughts? What if the very things we think -- our perceptions and beliefs -- actually sculpt our reality to conform? Confusing? Yes. Fascinating? Undoubtedly. Useful? Hmmm....

If we know (as sure as we can know anything) that anger alters brain chemistry, and that chronic anger alters brain chemistry permanently, and has an impact on the body systemically, then what if we just chose to feel something different? What if we made the conscious effort to feel differently, to send out different vibrations -- of love and forgiveness, pardon and understanding, peace and acceptance -- into our immediate environment, regardless of any perceived wrongs against us? And let's take it a step further... what if those perceived wrongs weren't really wrong? What if they were just unintentional slights that we filtered and promoted as full-blown wrongs?

Dr. Masaru Emoto, a Japanese researcher, set about in the late 90's to research the impact of emotion and thought on water. He began exposing small drops of water under a microscope to different emotions and musical stimuli, flash-freezing it and photographing it. What he discovered was that water crystals seemed to blossom in the presence of positive emotion and musical influence, but to break apart and scatter in the presence of negative emotion. I'm still not so sure of Dr. Emoto's creds, science-wise, but the point that is made in the movie is that, if negative emotion impacts water crystals, and we consist of roughly 70% water, then what kind of impact does negative emotion have on us and those around us?

What if the Buddhists are right, that what you send out into the world, thought-wise, emotion-wise, is what you get back (and then some)? Buddhists are no more or less entitled to be right than we are, so what makes us so sure that what they believe -- about the interconnectedness of all things in the universe, about the power of thought and emotion to alter reality, about the active construction of a new reality when the old one's not working -- is any more wrong or right than the reward-and-punishment system the Judeo-Christian world has developed?

It requires more thought... more study... more research. It's a big responsibility, isn't it? If my road rage is impacting other people negatively, even though I don't scream at them, or flip them off, or do something dangerous behind the wheel, but am just annoyed enough to curse them under my breath, then I have a responsibility to stop that. If my queue-a-phobia (resistance to standing in long lines) is kept entirely to myself, inside my own head, where no one can see it while I'm in line, then it still is having a negative effect on the world, and it's my responsibility to stop that. And if I have any negative body images that haunt me from my youth, based on the misperceptions with which I was raised, then I have a responsibility to stop that, for the sake of myself and those who love me.

I am committed to working this out and putting it into practice, though I'm not sure exactly how. So, what the do you know, anyway?

~C~

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Yo, Florida! Again, With The Missing Teenage Girls?!

UPDATE: From the AP wire: "Hillsborough County Sheriff David Gee announced early this evening that he believes the body of 13 year old Sarah Michelle Lunde has been found. Forensic examination will confirm the identity, but evidence leads investigators to believe with a high degree of certainty that Sarah’s body has been discovered."

Would someone please tell me what the hell is going on in Florida these days? 13-year old Sarah Michelle Lunde of Ruskin, Florida (near Tampa) has gone missing since Sunday. Jessica Marie Lunsford, age 9, was kidnapped, raped and possibly buried alive by a convicted sex offender less than a month ago in Crystal River, Florida, about 50 miles north of Tampa. 4-year-old Rilya Wilson disappeared while placed in foster care, and her foster mother was recently arrested in Miami and charged with her disappearance and possible murder.

And last year, one of the most horrific cases -- mainly because the abduction was captured on tape -- was that of Carlie Brucia, who was shown on a Sarasota car wash security tape being kidnapped by registered sex offender Joseph Smith. She was taken to another location, raped repeatedly, then murdered. She was 11.

If Martha Stewart is such a big threat to society that we have to keep her locked into an ankle bracelet 24/7 so we can keep tabs on her, what the hell are we doing letting the sex offenders walk around without so much as a "what's your business here, pal?" Martha Stewart is at risk of baking a robin's egg quiche. Joseph Smith raped and raped and was allowed to rape again.

What a freakin' world we live in! Would somebody please find this little girl -- alive, if it's not too damn much to ask, for cripes' sake!!!

Sheesh....
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Sarah Michelle Lunde
b. 8-30-90 d. 4-9-05


~C~

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

This just JUST in....

The urge wouldn't go away. I had to give into it. I force fed it a Haagen Dasz vanilla and almond bar.

That'll teach it....

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Take that, you malappropriate urge, you!! And that... and THAT... (It took several bites of ice cream before the urge skulked back under the rock from whence it came....)

This just in....

West Virginia lawmakers managed today to sneak a provision onto a piece of legislation regarding parks and recreation boards making English the official language of the state. This, in spite of the fact that similar legislation openly submitted and debated by the state senate was soundly defeated last year.

As usual, I'm trying to see the "up-side." Perhaps now that English is the official language of the state of West Virginia, West Virginians might actually learn to speak it properly.

Just a random thought....
~C~

Passed 3000

Wow... I looked at the counter this morning, and there it was -- 3006. Over three thousand times since my iVillage site debuted on April 15, 2002, people actually popped into the Chron to have a look-see. How flattering! I'm just curious... did you find what you were looking for? I mean... can I direct you to the "frozen foods" aisle or anything?

Which reminds me... I'm kind of jonesing for some ice cream today. Maybe I should head downstairs to the little store and get me a Haagen Dasz. Mmmmm... Maybe I'll just think about it some more until the urge passes.

So... I have much to tell you about my weekend, but I want to mull it over a little more. I posed nude for my friend Kate, who is painting up a storm in anticipation of a gallery show in the fall. It was interesting. It was (dare I say it?) kind of fun, in fact. It was fascinating watching her process. But, as I said... I want to think about it more before I write about it, so in a couple of days I'll share the adventure.

Okay! That's it! I'm putting this ice cream urge on notice. It has exactly one half hour to pass before I indulge it. Do you hear that, urge? One half hour, until 2:30 pm. And I don't mess around, so you better get busy leaving before I go downstairs and buy me some Haagen Dasz and show you what's what! (You have to show these urges who's boss.... It's the only way.)
XOXO
~C~
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Friday, April 08, 2005

Saucy Wenches of the World UNITE!

Image hosted by Photobucket.com



In honor (or "honour," if you're so inclined) of Camilla Shand Parker Bowles and her wedding to Prince Charles, I declare tomorrow, April 9th, officially SAUCY WENCH DAY. Saucy wenches everywhere can bask gloriously in the glow of Camilla as she finally gets her man, in broad daylight, in public and televised the world over.

Okay, I hear you say, but she's an adultress. She cheated on her husband with a married man, thereby destroying two marriages. And you'd be right, of course, so what would be the good in arguing. So I won't. I'll only say this: "So what?" She didn't slip Prince Charles a rufie and then have her way with him in the back room of some frat house. He chose her. If you believe everything everyone has to say, he chose her years before either of them were married, but that tired, stuffy old bag of a mother of his refused to let them get married thirty-five years ago. (Note: The Queen has a history of ruining people's lives this way, incidentally -- do a Google search on her sister, the late Princess Margaret, and see how she toyed with that sad little life.)

Why couldn't Charles marry Camilla all those years ago? Because Camilla was a saucy wench. Remember this -- the tragically, hopelessly unsaucy will do whatever they can to thwart and undermine us. They are merely jealous, because we are saucy and they are not.

Thankfully, because you can't keep a saucy wench down, she didn't let a little thing like royal disapproval and two marriages stop her. She went right on being her natural saucy self, and in the end, she got her man. He married Diana, but he never stopped loving her, and she remained his friend and advisor for years. It is reputed that she recommended Lady Diana Spencer as a prospective bride, which makes a wowser story, but has come under dispute in the last few years from some fairly reliable sources. She did try and take Diana under her wing, but promptly gave up when she discovered Diana didn't like horses or spectator sports, and loved disco and shopping. Camilla began to refer to Charles' wife as "that ridiculous creature," while Diana began to refer to Camilla as "the Rottweiler." (Bear in mind what I said about the tragically unsaucy.)

So, all eyes will be on Windsor tomorrow. Charles will be there. Camilla will be there. This wedding will be much different from the spectacle we saw in 1981. Charles isn't just approaching middle age -- he's embraced it full on and almost passed through it. And his bride isn't a virginal, overwhelmed little wisp of a cover girl, but a mature, middle-aged, attractive-in-that-British-kind-of-way woman of the world. She knows what the world has to offer, she knows there are disappointments, she understands that you don't get it just because you want it. She's loved and lost and loved again. She won't be wearing a big bowl of whipped cream and vanilla icing. My guess is she'll be dressed as she usually is -- tailored and tasteful, in something cream or candlelight. She'll carry a smallish bouquet and be wearing a minimum of jewels. She'll be in sensible, 2" pumps, no doubt and her hair and nails will be impeccably tended, as always. She will be smiling, her laugh lines (she is reputed to have a quick and wicked wit) beaming for all the world to see. She won't be on the cover of VOGUE any time soon. But my guess is, she won't be reading it any time soon either, much to her credit. She's the royal bride of a new era -- an era of war and soaring gas prices. Like the bride, we're older and we're wiser and we're a bit more prudent than we were in 1981.

But under that tailored, simple dress or suit, still beats the heart of a truly saucy wench -- one who didn't let spouses, children and a big extravaganza $52 million dollar wedding in 1981 get in the way of what she wanted. I love that in a woman. Someone bold enough and brash enough to do as she pleases and not give a jot about convention.... especially when that convention leads to loveless marriages to slightly dotty, pampered teenagers just to ensure a virgin in a frothy wedding gown. I'm reminded of Pride and Prejudice, when Elizabeth refuses to bow to Lady Catherine's prying into her relationship with Darcy, and instead tells her, "I am only resolved to act in that manner, which will, in my own opinion, constitute my happiness, without reference to you, or to any person so wholly unconnected with me." (Jane Austen, by the way... another very saucy wench... mmmhmmm.) If it is their intention to continue the monarchy and see Charles as their king, the British people should happily crown Camilla HRH. She is the only person who could possibly bring out the qualities in Charles that make him even remotely interesting (that "tampon" line may have been gross, but I found it weirdly creative... who knew?).

Camilla, dearest, regardless of how that whole title thing comes out, you'll always be queen of us saucy wenches. So you go! Marry that man, and kiss him twice for me. Kiss him for all the saucy wenches out there who have loved not wisely, but all too well.

XOXO

~C~

Tuesday, April 05, 2005

Woman and Madness

That's the title of one my texts for school, which starts tonight. It's also a little descriptor of what's been happening in my life these days. Chaos, upheaval, tumult... more other people's than mine... but explain to me -- if that's the case -- why I'm sitting here, staring at the untaken dose of Wellbutrin that's sitting on my desk, waiting for me to refill my water bottle so I can take it. Hmmmm.... It reminds me of some cheesy 50's horror flick dialogue, just as he's about to conduct some unspeakable experiment on the starlet who (for some inexplicable reason) is dressed only in her white satin slip... "They all said I was mad at the institute... but I'm not mad.... I'm not... Bwahahahahaaaa...."

No... really... I'm not....

So, back to school I go tonight, the beginning of a ten-week quarter. The course is entitled Psychology of Women Through Film and Literature -- obviously, I'm taking it as a Lit class. The class syllabus, so generously provided online prior to the start of the quarter, indicates that we will be using no fewer than five (count 'em -- FIVE) books (though some will only be selections of short story collections). Add that to the six texts required for my other class -- Lyric and Narrative, History and Imagination in Contemporary Literature -- and that's a whole lotta books. For two classes. Six units. Guess who's going to be reading a lot. Good thing I like to read.
I'm pretty excited about going back to school. I was really liking school for a while there. Then weird shit started to happen. In my Art of Fiction course in the Spring of 2004, the professor (whom I greatly admire and enjoy as a teacher) had her life take a sudden nosedive, and she ended up turning the day-to-day instruction over to her teaching assistant, a well-meaning, but very, very inexperienced grad student who's muddled instructions and inability to give meaningful, constructive critique made for an extremely frustrating quarter. She also made me doubt my ability and my talent, and I have wondered to myself whether that was intentional. It also made me wonder about the fragility of our little artist selves that one person's lack of support (and possible willful intent) could so quickly serve to undermine us. I have to own part of that, though I'm not sure exactly what needs to be done to shore up my creaky self-image as an artist.

What I do know is that school is a place where I can write badly with safety, which allows me to be a better, braver writer. I just have to be able to separate the wheat from the chafe in terms of professors and teachers who have my best interests at heart, versus those who are too insecure to teach well. What I also know is that school is marvelous excuse to read good writing, especially writing I might never have chosen to read of my own accord. Sad, but true -- some of the best writing I've read was forced into my hands by assignment. (And, no, Beth, I'm still not going to read The Poisonwood Bible anytime soon.)

Well, as marvy as this all is, I simply MUST refill my water bottle and take my Wellbutrin. Because... I'm not mad... I'm not....

XOXO

~C~