It seems that Atlanta Falcons' quarterback Michael Vick is, according to the police, deeply ensconced in a dogfighting ring that purchased, trained and fought dogs using Vick's money, and used facilities built on property he owned. The evidence is pretty damning to be sure. The police seem to have put together a strong case against Vick. Protestors for PETA and other animal rights groups are demanding that Vick be released from his contract with the Falcons.
Here's my problem. He hasn't been convicted yet. I don't care how much evidence you collect against someone, or how guilty they appear to be, until they're convicted in a court of law, neither the Falcons, nor PETA, nor any individual or group in this country, has the right to treat Vick as if he had already been found guilty. I'm deeply, profoundly disturbed by the rush to simply do away with due process so everybody can feel better about everything. On the day that Vick is convicted, or decides to change his plea from guilty to not guilty, then everyone can demand that he be treated as a convicted criminal (because he will be one). But until then, our Constitution (pesky little document that it is) keeps insisting that Vick is innocent until that wonderfully prolific evidence against him has been presented for consideration to a jury of his peers.
The dogs are out of harm's way, people. The ring is out of operation. So let's let the law do what it's supposed to, and either coax a change of plea or prosecute to the fullest the crime before us. But let's stop treating Vick as if he's already had his day in court.
~C~